The SammonShop | Blue Eagle | Web Columnist | Published .com | Freezerbox .com

Front Page 
 
 This Weeks Column
 
 2006 Column Archives
 
 2005 Column Archives
 
 2004 Column Archives
 
 2003 Column Archives
 
 2002 Column Archives
 
 2001 Column Archives
 
 Talk Back Forum
 
 My Books
 
 Column Links
 
 In Other News
 
 Guest Columnists
 
 Featured Column
 
 The Sammon Shop
 
Search


2003 Column Archives Last Updated: Apr 22nd, 2006 - 16:33:07


Bush Iraq Only Policy
By John Sammon
Jan 6, 2003

columnist sammon

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

North Korea believes that once President Bush has dispatched Iraq, they’re next to be gotten rid of.

North Korea needn’t worry.

Bush, in his New Year’s statement, said the recent crisis over North Korea’s atomic weapons building could be diffused by “political and economic pressure from its neighbors, particularly China.”

Then, Bush added that Iraq was still on the invasion list because, evidently unlike North Korea, “Saddam Hussein hasn’t heard the message.”

I’m trying to figure out. Is Bush a halfwit, or a liar?

North Korea has heard the message? They’ve been consistent, consistently dishonest. But what do you expect from Bolshevik North Korea------truth? You can be shot in that country for eating lice out-of-season.

North Korea violated the 1993 Clinton-sponsored agreement whereby they would cease building A-bombs in return for American nuclear technology. The American taxpayer was once again the sucker. The North Koreans took our money and technology, and just kept building their bombs as if nothing had happened.

They’ve admitted it.

Why is Bush now being nicer to these guys (North Koreans) than he is to Iraq?

Iraq has enslaved and abused its populace.

So has North Korea.

Iraq has weapons of mass destruction.

So has North Korea.

Iraq is a dangerously destabilizing influence in a volatile area of the world.

Ditto North Korea.

Iraq has neighbors we have diplomatic ties with, such as Egypt and Syria, who could influence her.

So does North Korea (China and Russia).

So why the difference? Why, the, “let’s handle North Korea diplomatically,” the friendly approach, and the unchanged, “let’s go ahead and bomb Iraq” plan?

Simple! Iraq is one of the few rogue states left it’s still easy for the U.S. to chastise, with what officials hope are few casualties (one of Bush’s military advisors said we could take out both Iraq and North Korea at the same time).

I know Iraq’s leader is a bad guy. It’s the cynical double standards and inconsistencies I hate. 

We can’t get too tough with North Korea because they have a big bully boy, China. We don’t want to anger China, our pal, our trading partner, whom the Clinton Administration gave top secret missile technology to in the 1980s (the rest China stole fair and square).

The reality is, we can’t stop other countries of the world, some of them rogue states, from doing what we’ve done, acquire nuclear weapons technology and act as arms merchants.

The message is clear. You can fear invasion by the U.S., only if your ruler is a nutcase, and only if the president can safely act tough with you, and only if you’re sufficiently isolated from the rest of the world, with no important powerful allies bordering you, and only if you have a vulnerably reduced military, and only if-----------the president holds you accountable to prior agreements

Be Heard! Voice your opinion on this article!
Visit the "Talk Back Forum" and post your comment.

Need great content for your web site?
Display this or other SammonSays columns on your webpage for FREE. Just Click Here!

  © Copyright 2004 by SammonSays.com


Top of Page

2003 Column Archives
Columns at a Glance
I Insist
I'm Not Scrooge
Don't Smell the Flowers
Driving
Not Me
The End of Substance
Caligulas Horse
Too Much
Wing and a Prayer
Luck Into One
Accept My Dog
War
Simple Candidacy
Pajamas
Can't Admit
Nervous Habits
American People to Fear
Wrong When Right
Media Circus
No Respect
Understanding
Fear and Loathing
Ana Pro
Run
NASA
My Car
Sledgehammer
Un-Rael
Butt Not Bad
Bush Iraq Only Policy
Bush & Lott